Later on, he proves his real intention. Thus, ensuing clashes during confrontation will be expected. He is a businessman, when it comes to analyzing the environments and situations and strategic thinking and planning.
It could be said that this yet again another act of manipulation. He event beats the minds of the Jocasta and Oedipus combined when later on his action plan is revealed. Upon reading the play initially one gets the notion of him having a bureaucratic orientation but that is not so.
One time he is a secretive rat like figure and one time he is the centre of sympathy for all. How did manipulation work for him? However it is later known that this is far from the truth, as his insecurity, cruelty and impulsiveness are concealed. Creon intentionally did not start by announcing his proclamation at the beginning as its unconventional nature tends to be frowned upon to say the least, or even be rejected by the conservative elders.
He took on the objects of equality and social order as mere means to an end. He then reveals his true self. Also, the role of gothic imagery should not be undermined. This speech plays a significant role in introducing the central theme of conflict, presenting polis in contrast with philos, heating up the situation and its tension quickly building up the rising action, conflict ready to break out any second.
Creon brings forth his opinion and reason against the king in lines that Oedipus and Jocasta rule together surely but not with equal power which according to him he is opposed to as Oedipus is merely the king for the sake of the title and nothing else.
Reflecting on the same occasion, Creon does not tell upon constant insistence from Oedipus along with that of Jocasta, Creon equivocates and dissembles happily, which was his yet another act of manipulation. Hence if a head-on collision between Antigone and Creon is set in due course, it would be expected to be not only a heated debate but a fight with ghastly consequences.
Overall, Creon is a skilled demagogue who crafted his speech with great care, making an abundant usage of rhetorical techniques to pursue his ultimate aim of justifying his proclamation. Considering the king and the citizens of Thebes, the Oedipus and Jacosta, where one time are against him, do ponder over what he says and despite of the fact that Creon is just one individual, his power to manipulate the truth and his real intentions, wins the game eventually.
When we compare him to Oedipus the difference is quite obvious. He is a politician and yearns for future developmental programs to gain public vote and interest and acceptability of the citizens of Thebes. This is only evident in the last scene of the play where Creon expresses his intentions to throw the king in exile and take over as a king and set him apart from his children.
He was isolated in the way that his interests were depicted as different and his way of doing things was termed as separate from that of the citizens of Thebes. His mind is powerful like many citizens and political personnel of Thebes. He then continues on with outlining his principles linesand only after that does he announce his proclamation regarding the treatment of Polyneices.
He was actually a man with a hidden agenda and through his power of the mind he overcomes all challenges and achieves what he desired. Character Analysis of Creon from the Oedipus. They anticipate the upcoming conflict between the two opposing forces and hence, suspense is created. The juxtaposition of the polarized extremes with syntactic patterning—two sentences paralleling each other, effectively contrasts the praise for the hero Eteocles and condemnation for the traitor Polyneices.
In fact, what he longed for was power and to achieve it he was willing to go far beyond others of his time. The audience then shares sympathy with him.
His opinion, when seems awkward to the audience, later on is favored when he is ordered to be banished.Character Analysis of Creon from the Oedipus essay writing service, custom Character Analysis of Creon from the Oedipus papers, term papers, free Character Analysis of Creon from the Oedipus samples, research papers, help.
The Qualitative Report Volume 21, Number 3, Article 6, Conceptual Understanding: A Concept Analysis Susan Mills Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania, USA The term conceptual understanding was analyzed to determine how educators.
Conceptual analysis begins with identifying research questions and choosing a sample or samples. Once chosen, the text must be coded into manageable content categories. The process of coding is basically one of selective reduction. By reducing the text to categories consisting of a word, set of.
May 17, · Character Analysis of Antigone and Creon in William Shakespeare´s Antigone Words | 5 Pages Antigone and Creon, the two displayed tragic figures of Antigone, both led themselves to their demise because of their love for themselves and the hate they both share for one another. In “Sophocles’ Praise of Man and the Conflicts of the Antigone,” Charles Paul Segal takes the stand that there are two protagonists in the drama (which conflicts with this reader’s interpretation): This is not to say that there are not conceptual issues involved in the characters of Creon and Antigone.
Antigone-Analysis of Creon's speech. Topics: Oedipus, Creon, Grammatical This is not to say that there are not conceptual issues involved in the characters of Creon and Antigone. But the issues are too complex to be satisfactorily reduced to a single antithetical formulation.Download