The players have become employees of the universities and conferences as much as students -- employees with no compensation, which not only violates common decency but perhaps even the law. College athletes should be paid to play for many reasons.
These amateur athletes have no incentive to stay in college and finish their respective degrees, as many cannot afford to pay for the increasingly expensive college experience. Through donations, ticket sales, media rights, advertising, and anything else with a price tag, these athletes are symbols for their school and their program.
This article was on of the rules that were put into the manual to protect the amateurism. At first, it was a great place to watch athletes play sports while making sure the rules were being followed. Most of the players in these leagues come from universities across the U. Yet with this large sum of money, no college athletes are legally compensated for their work.
Yet, no player can benefit from that work. Though college players have not reached the professional level, they are required to work at their sports like they are professionals.
In question right now is whether the BCS even conducts its business dealings in a manner consistent with principles expressed in federal anti-trust laws. If somebody is willing to give A. Players like Andrew Luck, who are the face of their university, deserve to be compensated.
If a music student goes out in the summer and earns 50 grand, who objects? The apparel also brings in a lot of money by selling hats, footballs, and jerseys. With all of the respect and publicity of these athletes, it goes unnoticed that a great deal of the players live very near to the poverty line.
It is not a secret that many of them make a decision to leave due to financial reasons; usually, they are allured by the perspective to start earning money with what they can do best sports outside of college.
Famous sportsmen and sportswomen have statuses similar to Hollywood celebrities, and their wages are high. Where exactly would the money come from? The athletic teams, however, are in the newspaper the entire year.
Universities bring in hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars to their athletic programs each year. According to Wally Renfro, a NCAA spokesman, the stipend would be a "special benefit", but if it were allowed to all schools and all athletes them it would not be Austin.
By denying them the ability to make money and not paying them, the NCAA and its members are expecting the athletes to live a sub-human existence, and putting them at a disadvantage to finish their college education.
If college athletes are eligible to be paid, there would be more athletes graduating. This stipend could help to cover expenses that are not covered in the scholarship.
In particular, Rodney Fort, a sports economist and professor of sports management at the University of Michigan, believes that the NCAA already possesses enough money to do so. These coaches will receive bonuses for getting to the playoffs, winning championships, or breaking school records.
Also the Orange Bowl holds over 60, people and they sell tickets at an average of 20 dollars each. For many athletes that is were it ends. The flip side of this is that not all sports teams are profitable.
Using the inability to distribute the funds equally as an impediment is an excuse, a rather intellectually lazy one at that. If a school makes a huge scientific achievement, they will be in the newspaper for a few days.
You know what athletes receive as a bonus?
Due to this lack of money, black-markets are created. Student athletes should be given a small stipend for their services to the university. We would pay athletes because when President Theodore Roosevelt helped create the NCAA inhe had no idea what it would grow into.
The reasons why college athletes should be paid are significant. Schools are then tempted to violate such rules to even out the playing field. Would the quality of the broadcasts or the coverage or the staging of the events be somehow diminished?
These universities that violate NCAA rules have an upper edge in recruiting top prospects. We were on the road all the time, even gone for two straight weeks at one point.There has been major discussion recently if college athletes should or shouldn't be paid while they are in school.
The first thing opponents say is, "They're already getting a scholarship! If the student as athlete can find a way, he/she should be able to endorse products, to have paid-speaking gigs, to sell memorabilia, as Allen Sack, the author and professor at the college of. College Athletes Should Get Paid Essay At some colleges, college athletics are a key source of income, and they attract students to their institutions.
Universities depend on their athletes to produce and maintain the popularity of their school's name. College athletes spend most of their time playing their sport for the college, most athletes see themselves more as athletes than students, and they feel like they should be paid for risking their body’s every day.
Persuasive Speech Why College Athletes Should Get Paid Persuasive speech $ Million the combined salary of the top 15 paid coaches in division 1 college football, $0 the combined salary of all student-athletesOver the past few decades, college athletics have gained popularity across the United States.
Whether it is football, basketball, or baseball, ever since the turn of the century. College athletes should be paid their due for a number of reasons. The NCAA should pay student athletes because it can do it.
According to polls among economists, there are no financial factors that prevent the NCAA from paying their athletes.Download