Based on the figures and evidence available today, the Five Year Plans seem to be highly successful in terms of economic progress. Wages were also an issue.
There is a lot for the Communists to do here and Stalin has set a lot of targets. A further aim was to create more urban workers. Collectivisation was perfect way for the State to gain complete control over the peasants and the agricultural production. At the same time, Stalin introduced dekulakisation, a communist movement to equalise all peasants — this meant that Kulaks rich peasants were sought out and forced to hand over their belongings.
In reality, because of this almost none of their targets were reached. The tasks were split up into three plans, each lasting five years. When collectivisation started many peasants did not need to work on the farms anymore, and so they would be free to work for heavy industry instead, so they were not left unemployed.
While industrialisation happened in the cities Collectivisation happened in the countryside. Collectivisation in particular solved a few problems with efficiency, but eventually the benefits were cancelled out by the huge problems of famine, fear and a general breakdown of society brought about by dekulakisation.
In my opinion the industrialisation of Russia was a success. Most of the heavy work was done by forced labour.
But Stalin did manage to industrialise and collectivise. Stalin seemed to have produced a more socialist society, with people working together to improve their nation.
However hard work was rewarded, and wages were dependent on the amount of product an individual produced. They were often shot, or sent to labour camps.
Many of the rebellious peasants were tortured or killed also. People truly believed that the harder they worked, the better the life they or their children would be able to lead later on. Food was extremely basic also with just grain and crop being supplied.
Collectivisation was much more communist orientated than the Five Year Plans — the ways Russia was being improved brought it closer to a communist society.
As well as this, although the number of pigs increased from 20 million in to 29 million inmost other animal numbers decreased dramatically. They were so against this they decided they would rather kill and eat their animals than have them go towards the good of the country.
Collectivisation aimed to banish these capitalist ways of life to be replaced by more Communist ways of farming. Stalin created a super power out a laughing stock in 10 years. Another failure was the betrayal of Communist ideas, the more skilled of a worker you were the more you got paid — this was against everything Communism stood for.
Also industrialisation and collectivisation are reliant upon each other in that the factories need to produce tractors to make farming more efficient and mechanised but the factories need workers from the countryside before they can produce tractors efficiently.
I would call Collectivisation a success and a failure as Russia managed to produce more grain than before but 13 million people died from a man made famine which is a terrible amount.
Thanks to these and the industrial success, support for Communism and Stalin grew greatly. Awful living and working conditions meant that millions died to complete the Five Year Plans.
Another aim of industrialisation was to impress other countries.Hire Writer; Essay Help; Log In; Home Page \ Free Essays \ How successful were Stalins Economic Policies; How successful were Stalins Economic Policies.
Stalin’s economic policies can be seen as a significant success, because they achieved their overall goals of modernising and improving Russia as quickly as possible, in order to catch up and.
To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful - Assignment Example On In Assignment Sample After Lenin’s death in January there was a struggle for power within the Bolshevik party as Lenin did not specify a new leader.
- Introduction This essay investigates to what extent Josef Stalin’s personal and political worldviews shape and reflect his application of Communism.
These reasons include Purges, Secret Police, Stalin?s economic policies and Propaganda and cult of the personality. [tags: Joseph Stalin] - Joseph Stalins rule was profoundly.
Home > Assignment Sample > Did The Benefits of Stalin’s Economic Policies Justify Their Implementation. We will write a custom essay sample on Any topic specifically for you For Only $/page.
To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful. Explain the impact of Lenin’s economic policies (8m) Lenin’s economic policies included the War Communism, which was implemented during the civil war in as well as the New Economic Policy (NEP), which was implemented in War communism was the name given to the name of the harsh economic measure the Bolsheviks adopted.
There were both positive and negative effects of each of these economic policies, which this essay will discuss, coming to the conclusion that it was mainly a failure due to the amount of human lives lost.Download