Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Personal stories, sometimes called "anecdotal evidence," refer to individual experiences. Assess evidence quality[ edit ] WP: If conclusions are worth mentioning such as large randomized clinical trials with surprising resultsthey should be described appropriately as from a single study: Sometimes the term "refereed" is used instead of peer review.
Moreover, to make sure you are retrieving information from a reliable site it is always important to check to see who is sponsoring the site. MEDSCI Scientific journals are the best place to find both primary source articles about experiments, including medical studies, and secondary sources.
An important element of studying large populations like the DES cohort studies is that individual experience is included in the reported data. Speculative proposals and early-stage research should not be cited to imply wide acceptance.
The best evidence for treatment efficacy is mainly from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials RCTs. If recent reviews do not mention an older primary source, the older source is dubious. National Institutes of Health, Resources: The problem is that it takes an enormous amount of time to sift through the millions of hits in google to find those that are reliable.
They may or may not be consistent with scientific research. If the site does not allow you to know how or why your information is needed, there is a chance of that site being unreliable. To prevent misunderstanding, the text should clearly identify the level of research cited e.
Indeed, it is possible to find reliable sources through the google search process.
The other important thing that you pointed out, Ed, is that in doing the search of scholarly sources, you found out some information that was contrary to what you expected—and a bit surprising—about what kinds of adolescents are susceptible to gang membership.
I stopped and chatted with her and asked how she was doing. Information is of uneven quality. While the most-recent reviews include later research results, this does not automatically give more weight to the most recent review see recentism.
There is no way to check the credibility of the web site.
More and more, health-related Web sites and newsletters are available to people with Internet access. Secondary sources are those that describe or analyze primary sources, including: If material can be supported by either primary or secondary sources — the secondary sources should be used.
High-quality health Web site; useful for consumers Strengths: However, in vitro and animal-model findings do not translate consistently into clinical effects in human beings.Primary sources should generally not be used for medical content – as such sources often include unreliable or preliminary information, for example early in vitro results which don't hold in later clinical trials.
Check to see if the information is current (less than three years old). Look for the credentials of the author (i.e. doctor, nurse, psychologist) to make sure the information is written by a health professional.
Health sites: The good, the decent, the unreliable. Visit killarney10mile.com for independent ratings of the 20 most-visited health Web sites.
Three Types of Resources In general, there are three types of resources or sources of information: primary, secondary, and tertiary. It is important to understand these types and to know what type is appropriate for your coursework prior to searching for information.
Three examples of unreliable medical resources there are plenty of medical sources throughout the World Wide Web this section will present examples of unreliable resources and how to detect those sites.
Unreliable Sources - Some Examples Following are some examples of inaccurate or unreliable websites and videos - resources that receive a low score according to our rubric and therefore likely contain information that may be misleading to people who stutter.Download